Tahoe agencies close to failing in their job to implement change post-Angora Fire


By Kathryn Reed

Five years later and people are still wondering how they will evacuate safely from the Lake Tahoe Basin in an emergency, if a reverse 911 system has been installed, and how to get their neighbors to get rid of that shake roof.

While a panel of agency officials sat on the stage of the theater at South Tahoe High School on Monday talking about what they have done in the five years since the Angora Fire, it was more personal information the audience sought.

But answers for them were few or limited.

The June 25 forum was hosted by state Sen. Ted Gaines, R-Roseville. Speakers were Gareth Harris of Lake Valley Fire Protection District, Kelly Keenan with CalFire, Patty Kouyoumdjian of Lahontan water board, Joanne Marchetta-TRPA, and Mike LeFevre-USFS.

North Shore real estate agent Sue Daniels asked why the Caltrans signs can’t alert people about red flag warning days and what the state’s $150 rural fire tax will be spent on.

Gaines said he would look into the sign question. As for the tax, he calls it double dipping. The money collected from homeowners won’t help CalFire or any firefighting efforts.

Keenan explained the tax means $89 million for CalFire, but in reality the department’s budget from the state has been reduced by that same amount so the tax is not a net gain to the state fire agency. What people are paying for is unknown. The tax really goes to the general fund to be spent however the governor and Legislature want.

A resident in the Lake Valley area asked what to do about a neighbor who believes doing nothing to their fire prone-shake roof is fine.

Harris said his district received a $5 million grant from FEMA to deal with just that issue. The money is available to assist homeowners in Lake Valley, Meek’s Bay and Fallen Leaf Lake fire districts.

But Harris also encouraged residents to call their local fire department about any defensible space issue and have the firefighters be the bad guys and the court be the enforcer if it were to get to that point.

Angora burn area resident Susan Ward told the audience of more than 100 how she never received a reverse 911 call five years ago. No one told her Monday night the reason there was no call is because the El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department thought the governor had to make that decision. Not so. The county has the capability to use this system without Sacramento’s OK – so do other jurisdictions.

While El Dorado County Sheriff John D’Agostini and South Lake Tahoe Police-Fire Chief Brian Uhler attended the forum, neither spoke and neither stayed until the end. They would be the ones to answer how the 911 system works.

The other issue Uhler and D’Agostini could have addressed is the evacuation plan because that is the job of law enforcement. None of the speakers could give any details about how people will be evacuated in the event of an emergency.

It was total chaos five years ago that proved whatever system might have been in place did not work. This proved true the Sunday the fire started and then the Tuesday when the Tahoe Keys area was evacuated when the fire jumped Highway 89.

Grading the work done post-Angora

State Sen. Ted Gaines reveals the agencies in the Lake Tahoe Basin barely received a passing grade based on the lack of implementation of recommendations post-Angora. Photos/Kathryn Reed

Gaines had asked the non-partisan Senate Office of Research to examine how the 90 recommendations issued by the bi-state Blue Ribbon Fire Commission that was convened by then Govs. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jim Gibbons had been implemented.

Sixty have been completed and 10 are in the process. To this, Gaines gave the effort a C-minus grade – barely passing by most standards.

One recommendation of the bi-state commission was to, “Adopt the priority of life, property, and the environment, in that order, with respect to fire safety and fire prevention.” The action taken, according to the report released Monday, was, “Implemented.”

Firefighters have those priorities, but those who control the basin have a different agenda. Water quality is one. Spending grant money to keep their jobs is another. Planning and more planning without implementation appear to be other priorities.

“It’s not an important issue, it’s an urgent issue,” Gaines said of needing to make Lake Tahoe fire safe.

He doesn’t understand when people talk about the importance of Lake Tahoe how protecting it from a devastating fire isn’t at the top of the list. He pointed to the Democrats in the state Legislature not wanting to fund projects that would help Tahoe.

One of the recommendations was to create an 800 number for people to call for information about defensible space guidelines. But the number provided in the report went to a personal residence when Lake Tahoe News called it Monday night.

An “undetermined” was the action for the recommendation, “To avoid continued confusion regarding interagency communications during wildland fire occurrences, all dispatch centers and responding resources in the Tahoe basin will adhere to the existing agreements.”

Considered “implemented” was the recommendation to, “Work with their respective congressional delegation to establish an annual sustainable fund for forest health for the Lake Tahoe Basin.”

But the people speaking on the stage Monday said money is an issue and there is no “sustainable fund” for fuel reduction or firefighting. Congress has not reauthorized the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act that supplied the initial money for environmental projects that included fire related activities. SNPLMA funds are about exhausted. And some entities in the basin would like the remaining Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act dollars be spent on a loop road on the South Shore instead of fire related issues.

One of the recommendations that was found to be “undermined” was, “Find more stable, long-term funding to replace the stopgap funding provided by the states, likely through the collection of a parcel fee or similar special assessments on property owners.”

Everyone in at the forum would likely have categorized that as “not implemented”.

Going into the burn

Before the evening meeting, Gaines went on a tour of the Angora burn, witnessing the forest as it looks today, talking to homeowners who have rebuilt and seeing a community garden that has sprouted from the ashes.

“We all move to Tahoe because it’s beautiful. We stay because of the people,” Marsha Hudson told Gaines. She said having an evacuation to-do list on the inside of a cupboard helped her family retrieve more belongings than they would have otherwise remembered in such a stressful situation.

(Click on photos to enlarge.)











About author

This article was written by admin


Comments (8)
  1. earl zitts says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    Everyday in Tahoe is a red flag day during summer. Some days are just less red flag than others.
    The five panelists were sure self-congratulatory. Bragging about changes they implemented after a gun was put to their head. Joanna was so proud that now a 14 inch tree could be chopped instead of a 6 incher before the fire without a permit. Bully. Why not a 20 incher? They streamlined paperwork mazes
    (oh goody) while straining their shoulder muscles patting themselves on their backs. They also complained about a lack of money to accomplish projects while they enjoy very large salaries and extremely generous pensions. They are gold medal winners in the bureaucratic olympics.
    Hint. Think about what should be done after the next conflagration and implement it now. Then you will be doing you job.

  2. Bob says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    Everyone should just deduct the $150 from their bill and the Govenator will get the message. A comp roof by the way will not stop a forest fire the size of Angora. Nor will a fire sprinkler system.

  3. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    Seems like a nice safe distraction, that everyone can get on board with.

    How about some help with the economy, and the fact that South Lake Tahoe has a higher unemployment rate, and is being choked out by environmental agencies.

    How about trying to create jobs in our town…

  4. Diana Hamilton says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    We talked to some fire crew guys who were working on a thinning project on the south side of Emerald Bay where there are NO houses.

    What are they doing in the neighborhoods, crammed with houses & tons of dead branches – the fuel ladder?

  5. Diana Hamilton says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    Great sentence from story: “Spending grant money to keep their jobs is another.”

  6. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    Diana, Great catch and comment regarding spending Grant money (our money).
    Taxes should be voter approved locally, collected locally and spent locally. Federal money is not free, you are giving it to the Congress who takes credit for giving it back to a Federal agency who might use it where you live.

  7. Susie Kocher says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    I don’t know anything about plans to get an 800 number to find out about defensible space guidelines, but there is a lot of great information on our Living with Fire in the Tahoe basin website:

  8. Hang Ups From Way Back says - Posted: June 26, 2012

    They are off jacking the Morons,you are no safer than you were before the fire,like lighting,woods burns twice,amazing these people walk around get paid bigger bucks that the Grunts in this town ,sleep well with Federal cash in the Bank account.

    This over EPA Programmed dinner you been eating since 1970.
    The forest service and the trpa bunch monkeys makes it hard to get a sweet Banana to put in the bank account for winter time blues,but hey it’s Tahoe.

    If you got the cash no one cares,kinda the way it goes, plus you can build a bigger deck,you got grease the bass monkey til it smiles.