THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

South Tahoe asks employees, citizens what they want


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

This month results of two surveys administered by South Lake Tahoe will be released.

slt sealIn December employees of the city were asked to answer 71 questions from five categories – communications within the city, my supervisor, my work group, quality of the work environment, and the city as an employer.

City Manager Tony O’Rourke said he could not find any evidence of such a survey being done in the 45 years the city has been incorporated.

“We will have action plans for the survey results within 30 days of the findings,” O’Rourke told Lake Tahoe News. “Department heads and manager will be accountable to make the changes.”

Bill Chiat, a consultant with Alta Mesa Group, is spearheading the process for both surveys. He is expected to share the employee survey results with department heads in mid-January.

Although there were rumors polls were being taken after the employee sessions, Lake Tahoe News could find no evidence of this to be true. Employees could talk to each other about how they answered the questions, but neither the unions nor management organized any strategy to gauge results prior to them being collated by the consultant.

More than 90 percent of employees took the survey, O’Rourke said.

Results from the community survey will be available later this month, with the goal of having at least the raw data for when the City Council has its strategic planning session the afternoon of Jan. 25.

Drilling down to compare South Tahoe’s data to cities of similar size will take some time, with that analysis possibly not available until February. The last time a citizen survey was taken was 2008. Almost the identical questions were asked so the city can make comparisons to responses.

Nearly 3,000 surveys were sent to a random selection of residential addresses. Questions start with ranking quality of life in South Lake Tahoe and end with items about the budget.

There are 22 questions, but many are multi-dimensional, so it’s really longer than that.

O’Rourke is interested to see if the 69 percent who ranked the aesthetics of the town fair to poor in 2008 feel the same way.

“Clearly that issue has been raised in the past and has not been addressed,” he said.

The cost of the two surveys is about $16,000 combined, which comes out of the professional services budget. O’Rourke would like such surveys to be a line item in future budgets. He intends to conduct surveys annually to track trends.

“I’m not overly concerned what the issues are. The focus needs to be addressing them. The focus needs to be on the process of constantly improving, not laying blame and retribution,” O’Rourke said. “No matter how good we think we are there are opportunities for improvement.”

Here is the employee survey and the citizen survey, as well as the 2008 survey results.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (5)
  1. Steve says - Posted: January 10, 2011

    In 2005, the City’s second annual citizen/voter survey asked how important its citizens thought building a new city convention center was. The largest category, at 42%, was outright “disapproval”, outweighing all other categories like “somewhat”, “very”, and “extremely” important.

    The year prior, a similar survey sent out to residents asked if they would support an increase in the city sales tax. That question received a 2/3 “definitely not” from the respondents.

    The City ignored both answers and did just the opposite.

    Wary citizens are likely wondering if results of this new survey will be similarly ignored.

  2. HARDtoMAKEaLIVINGinTAHOE says - Posted: January 10, 2011

    The answers and question period is long over, they are not qualified to make reasonable decisions because they are tied to the horse that drag’s the Wagon LOADS of solution to the shredder.
    They are so covered up with their own Bad, Self Made Problems; they don’t know which way to spit in the wind.
    This is just ANY OLD TOWN, A DRIFT IN A FINACIAL SUCIDE OF LOST GRANTS, NO CONCERTE SOULUTIONS, BESIDE THE SAME OLD BS, PR, THEY DISHED OUT FOR THE LAST TWO DECADES.
    EVERYTHING RUNNING ON EMERERGY BACK UP CASH THAT’S MELTING IN THE SNOW OF A HOT DEBATE OF A CITY STORM OF PEOPLE ON THE CONCIL THAT ARE NOT QUALIFIED OR EDCATED TO PERFORM THE TASKS WE REALLY NEED.
    On top this, they are too ignorant to admit they need real help….!
    If the general public so ignorant to not realize this, then it’s par Norm for a 3 par course (present, past, future,) that the Ugly head keeps RASING UP, coming back to bite its own AZZ! A true catch 22 is a real reality in paradise of the clear water lake.
    There are no reasons to keep asking more questions when they can’t answer the ones already delivered to their desks that never were read or answered, while phones ring off the hook every day, they don’t bother to call you back EITHER.
    Then they wonder why more the public doesn’t get involved with the community solving problems that HAVE STUCK WITH us for so many years, voters who close the shades, ignore their cries for HELP..

  3. Bob says - Posted: January 10, 2011

    For under $1000 you could have put the survey online and used the other $15000 to get the snow off of our sidewalks. Plus you could of had all of the surveys you wanted for a full year at this price. SurveyMonkey.com Check it out Tony.

  4. old school says - Posted: January 10, 2011

    The city is famous for wasting money on “studies.” The employees should provide much of they information they desire. Dissolve city today.

  5. lou pierini says - Posted: January 12, 2011

    Information from studies is a waste of time and money. 99% of the info. in these studies is available from previous studies or online, and the staff sits back and watches.