THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Settlement in Alpine County toxic mine case


image_pdfimage_print

Even though over the course of decades more than $100 million has been spent on cleanup activities at an old sulfur mine in Alpine County, a settlement agreement between disagreeing parties was just reached.

In July, at the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board meeting officials said the settlement could happen any day. It took another eight months.

The Leviathan Mine is considered a superfund site, making it one of the most toxic areas based on Environmental Protection Agency standards. As a CERCLA site, there are certain parameters that must be followed. And there is also a certain amount of risk that is allowed. This site will presumably always be toxic, just not to the degree that it is today.

Leviathan holding ponds and treatment system used by Lahontan. Photo/Lahontan Water Board

Leviathan holding ponds and treatment system used by Lahontan. Photo/Lahontan Water Board

It is better than what it was. In 1999, there were no rainbow, brook or brown trout in Lower Leviathan Creek, according to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. In 2013, there were 72 rainbows, 521 brooks and zero browns.

Anaconda Copper Mining Company used the mine from 1951-62. It was sold in 1963 to William Mann, who was Alpine County’s clerk, for $100. Eventually officials discovered acid mine drainage was contaminating Leviathan Creek. There was no way Mann was going to be able to write the checks for the cleanup. California stepped in in 1983 and bought the land.

A lawsuit was filed against Atlantic Richfield Co., which had bought Anaconda. A settlement of just more than $2 million allowed clean up to start. But then the Washoe tribe asked the EPA to get involved because the pollutants were creating a thick layer of orange precipitate along the streambed that ended up in the East Fork of the Carson River. The EPA went after ARCO, and in turn ARCO filed a suit against Lahontan.

It is that second lawsuit that was just settled.

The settlement details what work ARCO and Lahontan will conduct at the site going forward, and lays out the cost-sharing formulas. The settlement also secures long-term funding for a cleanup project that could take decades, if not centuries to complete, according to officials. Lahontan will design and construct the remedy, and ARCO will pay 75 percent of the cost to complete it. ARCO will also pay 70 percent of Lahontan’s expense to operate and maintain the remedy over the long term.

Today, Lahontan and ARCO have separate treatment systems. The settlement allows for just one.

— Lake Tahoe News staff report

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (4)
  1. Doug says - Posted: April 3, 2015

    Bet ARCO is really glad they bought Anaconda. Wonder when that purchase was, whether they drove the bad mining, or just got stuck later due to their deep pockets.

  2. Tracy says - Posted: April 4, 2015

    Happy to see that it will get cleaned up, even thought it will take time. Alpine County deserves safe lands. let the healing begin.

  3. Cranky Gerald says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    Arco bought Anaconda years and years after mining of Leviathan was shut down.

    I think the property was just on the asset list for the sale, which was based on Anaconda’s other active mining properties.

    You gotta wonder what the Alpine County Clerk was thinking….Using his position to try to make a killing is my best guess.

  4. Blue Jeans says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    A great many people complain about regulation but it is only strict regulation that will prevent this sort of thing. This very disaster is being replicated in other US locations because we don’t demand strict enforcement of restoration from domestic or foreign companies. Yes, cry out if you wish about environmental regulations but keep in mind that the price will be paid by a company during exploitation or by the taxpayer afterward. Take your pick. Probably less damage is done if protection and clean up regulations are contractual from the get go.