THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Revamp S. Tahoe’s mayoral process


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

In one week, South Lake Tahoe will presumably have a new mayor.

It is customary that the council selects the mayor at the first December meeting. And it is customary that the mayor pro tem becomes the mayor. There have been exceptions, including mayors serving for more than one term.

This has pretty much been the process since the city incorporated in 1965. For most of those 48 years the role of mayor has been little more than ceremonial. The primary job is to run meetings that are once or twice a month. The mayor signs paperwork. That person helps set the agenda with city staff. And the mayor attends events in town on behalf of the city.

The Brown Act doesn’t allow for council members to work out among themselves ahead of time who the mayor will be. At most, they may discuss this, or any topic, with one other council member.

If I were to bet, on Dec. 10 I would say Hal Cole – who is mayor pro tem – would become mayor and Brooke Laine mayor pro tem. But that’s not what I’m advocating for.

First, I think we need to change the process of how the mayor is chosen. And while that is not likely to happen this year, it is time the citizenry became more interested in who the mayor of South Lake Tahoe is.

In the last few years as the city has taken a stronger stance regionally, in California and Nevada, and nationally, the role of mayor has evolved into more than a ceremonial position. Mayors are seen as leaders of a city and a notch above the other council members. With the title, there is a perceived sense of power from the person who has the job and those looking in from beyond the basin.

That is why it is time South Lake Tahoe rethinks how the mayor is chosen. Right now it’s a bit of popularity contest. If your colleagues don’t like you, you won’t get to be mayor. Just ask Bill Crawford and Bruce Grego. There have been others, too, in the past who served on the council without ever being mayor.

I am not a fan of the top vote getter being mayor. Being most popular does not make one most qualified.

It’s probably not legal, but what if when there is a council election, if there could be a question asking who out of the candidates as well as the council members not up for election would you want to be mayor? And then the top person became mayor.

Or what if the five council members had to fill out an application form like city commissioners do? A special form would be created for this position. Then each person wanting the position could give a short speech about why they are best. The five deliberate in public and a vote is taken.

Then the mayor gets to pick the mayor pro tem.

Or maybe there should be a public committee convened to pick the mayor? There have been community members asked to help select staff.

What if the mayor had the job for two years?

These are just things to think about. I’m sure others have better ideas. But we as the residents of South Lake Tahoe should start thinking about how our mayor gets appointed and who it is. That person represents us. We have the power to effect change in the process if we want to.

So, if I were the anointer of South Lake Tahoe’s mayor and mayor pro tem, I would pick Angela Swanson and Brooke Laine, respectively.

First, Tom Davis’ lack of leadership this past year as mayor proves he does not warrant a second term. As mayor he showed up at the state Legislature wearing one of his infamous Hawaiian type shirts. And he was there to give testimony. He used his tired phrase to tell the lawmakers “it was like speed dating” when it came to the amount of time he had to talk.

Davis and Hal Cole are often dismissive to their female colleagues.

At the Veterans Day ceremony Davis acknowledged the whereabouts of all of his colleagues except for Swanson. Davis and Cole have shunned Swanson in part because she was party to a charity taking money from someone who was later sent to prison on felony drug charges. She has never been charged with a crime, let alone arrested. Cole also hasn’t forgiven Swanson for alleging he was being racist during a council meeting.

While Cole runs a meeting well, he is not one who likes to socialize and glad-hand. Plus, he is the city’s rep on the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency board. Doing both well can be difficult. (Think Claire Fortier.)

JoAnn Conner is still too green to be mayor.

Laine, while she has served on the council for four years before this stint and was mayor, is there this time as an appointee to Fortier’s term. No one who was not elected by the citizens of South Lake Tahoe should be mayor, in my opinion. If she had been elected, I would have picked her. She is the only one who looks at people when they speak – whether it’s the public, a colleague or staff. The others have dismissive body language to colleagues, spend time on smart phones despite a ban on them, and often don’t seem to pay attention.

Put Laine in as mayor pro tem. This way if she runs for re-election in a year and gets on, she would be the front runner for the job as mayor – especially if the process is not changed.

While some could say by default this leaves Swanson as the choice for mayor, but the truth is she is the right person for the job. She has come out as saying she is not running for re-election next year because she wants to be county supervisor. Being mayor will give the public a chance to see if she is a leader. It will force her to learn the meaning of the word brevity and practice it – because a mayor needs to have that skill and she has yet to demonstrate she has it. The mayor should be the last person to give her or his opinion. She will need to be efficient with her time and be able to not mix campaigning with city work. That will be a test of ethics.

Swanson has shown leadership by taking on tasks beyond the expected council assignments. She is working in Sacramento on behalf of the city. At some point she will have to demonstrate how all those hours translate into meaningful benefits for the city and not just for herself as she seeks a life in politics.

This is by no means an endorsement of Swanson for supervisor. It’s just one person saying Swanson should be mayor of South Lake Tahoe for the next year. And more important, it’s time we rethink how the mayor is chosen.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (9)
  1. Tahoe Mom says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    Interesting piece. I think Swanson and Laine are the most open-minded members on the City Council and that they would be best to guide us into a new era of balancing local development that embraces Tahoe’s mountain culture while protecting the Lake. Best listener for Mayor!

  2. Irish Wahini says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    Sounds like Tom Davis & Hal Cole could use some Diversity Training. Being dismissive to women Council members, audience speakers, staff — none of this behavior flies today. Those who do not lead with respect don’t belong in office.

  3. Try this on for size says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    Excellent Article Kae and a good Idea.

    How about having an election that is for a 4 year term for Mayor that is elected by the people in the City ?
    Then there would be no Question as to who will be the next Mayor.

  4. reza says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    Very good observations about Cole and Davis.

    The real question is how do they both keep getting elected. If you want to solve the problem with them being mayor, you need to be able to understand why voters keep putting them in.

    Love the candidness of your editorial and wish you wrote them more often. You are the only daily news with an opinion and the community needs your voice to at the least, prompt some intelligent discourse about the issues our town faces.

  5. reloman says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    I kinda of dont agree about having Angela as Mayor in this term, as she is running for supervisor and that would take away from her duties as Mayor. Any event she would be attending would be more as a canidate and not as a representive of the City of South Lake Tahoe.

  6. Garry Bowen says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    At least I can say that the City, when originally founded in November, 1965, by following the now-questioned practice of “the most votes becoming Mayor”, set the proper tone at that time, as the first Mayor, Brad Murphy, was the prominent CPA in town (presumably the reason he got the most votes), thereby assuring somewhat of a balanced look at the budget process – something that seems to have been lost in our ‘debt-accumulating’ world.

    That allowed a more fundamental ‘accounting’ for when things were going “south”, steps could be taken in a little more reasonable way to alleviate the problem – called “management” – in time, versus way down the road, when the problem is acute enough to have to borrow our way out of it. . .

    As the correct tone was set in Mr. Murphy’s time, and many have adulterated it since (think Terry Trupp, as one glaring example), it may in fact need to be looked at again, especially in terms of moving from any dysfunction to “fully functional”, as the reigning agency has abrogated their role through ‘area plans’ that a normal council can’t fully understand the consequences of. . . a future cannot merely ‘show up’, it will probably have to be created, with a more significant process than that working now.

  7. Ken Curtzwiler says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    Here ya go Gary.
    Mayor and Councilmen 1965
    William B Murphy-1377 votes
    Gerald E Martin-1194 votes
    Eugene E Marshall-1082-votes
    Norman C Woods-996 votes
    Donald L Clarke-971 votes
    For Incorporation-2011 votes
    Against Incorporation-613 votes
    City Name: South Lake Tahoe-1290 votes
    Lake Tahoe-1172 votes
    Not much has changed on voter involvement or turnout in the past 49 years.

  8. Les Wright says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    Kae,
    Is the current process written into the City Charter? Or can the council change the procedure?

    I would favor a 4-year mayor who can steer the city down a path that the people want to go. I would give the remaining 4 city council members the power to call for a new election of the mayor after the first two years, if they feel the present mayor is not leading the city in the right direction.

    That idea needs some tweaking but is my initial two cents on the subject

  9. Garry Bowen says - Posted: December 3, 2013

    To ‘Ski Bum’:

    Thanks for the recap – of course, the “City’ was much smaller then (a higher proportion of voters ?), but you’re right, the proportion is way too low (proportionate to all who have an “opinion”). . .but it also took it’s toll, to set that tone: Brad Murphy sold his practice (the price of creating a City from scratch) and died from cancer just a while later.

    Norm Woods of course spent many years in the service of SLT, as did Don Clarke, the builder of SLT’s first “high-rise” (1959), the two-story building at the corner of 50 & Brockway (across from the ‘Jack-in-the-Box’).

    There are alternatives to the way we do it now, but once again, your implication is correct – the citizens don’t know what they want – which gives ‘bureaucracies’ the license they now have. . . it wasn’t the same when business (way more of it) held sway, leaving “agencies” to merely do their job, not assume & maintain control. . .