THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Tahoe City visionaries talking about overhauling the town


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

TAHOE CITY – A hotel where Safeway is as well as one along the golf course. Residences above street level businesses. Side streets with commercial offerings instead of just along the highway. Expanded recreation. Improved public transit.

Those are some of the visions a group of business owners and others have for Tahoe City. Their vision was unveiled at a standing-room-only meeting of more than 80 people on Sept. 27 at Granlibakken resort.

“For me, things have changed a lot,” Douglas Dale, who has owned Wolfdale’s restaurant for 34 years, said. Mostly the change is in the winter. “I can barely break even, if I do. The mousetraps of Squaw Valley and Northstar have done us in.”

This is one vision for a section of Tahoe City. Rendering/Design Workshop

Skiers are staying at those resorts in the winter and no longer venture into Tahoe City.

It also didn’t help that when the villages opened they lured Tahoe City businesses to their locations with the promise of free rent – some for a year. Then when the rents were established they kept going up and many of those original Tahoe City businesses are nowhere to be found. But what can be found are empty storefronts in the villages and in town.

Some of the visuals that were presented on easels Thursday night portrayed a Tahoe City larger and more developed than what exists now. A connectivity, though, between the sectors, with more open space and access to Lake Tahoe were also illustrated.

One of the goals would be to tap into what is expected to be an overhaul of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s Regional Plan – which is expected to be adopted later this year – to allow for mixed uses and increased building height.

“What gets our dander up is high-rises on the lake. That is the difference between us and the South Shore,” Mary Cushing said.

Sue Daniels, a Realtor in Tahoe City, told the group, “There is a myth in society that bigger is better. It’s important to keep that in mind. Our population is much, much larger than it was in the 1960s. Yes, it’s gone down since the 1980s. This has happened across the nation. We can fix this town without five stories on the lake.”

She was one of several people who took issue with the speakers saying more lake access is crucial, but then said it might be for the tourists via a hotel room.

Richard Shaw, who works out of the Aspen office of Design Workshop, was at the meeting to explain some of the concepts that have been developed. (He is also the main man at Design Workshop behind the South Shore vision process. )

He said the primary challenges facing Tahoe City are:

• Almost the whole downtown is built on a stream environmental zone;

• Decline in full-time residents;

• No hotel rooms in the prime areas where tourists want to be;

• Decline in market share;

• Small parcels have multiple owners.

Dale, along with Roger Kahn whose family ran Porters Sports for years, Brendan Madigan of Alpenglow Sports, Gary Davis of Gary Davis Engineers, Wally Auerbach of Auerbach Engineers and Steve Hoch, executive director of the Tahoe City Downtown Association, were the primary speakers during the more than two-hour high-energy gathering.

Business owners, TCDA, Tahoe City Public Utility District and North Lake Tahoe Resort Association hired Design Workshop for about $35,000 to help develop a vision for the North Shore community.

Business reps pointed to the large amount of public money spent on improving aspects of town – like Commons Beach, bike trails and other infrastructure, but admitted the private sector has not done its part to reinvest in the community.

It was said many times at the Thursday meeting how Tahoe City does not want to resemble present day South Shore, or either of the villages at Squaw or Northstar. But it was also clear that a consensus on what the future of this town of 1,557 should look like was not going to be decided at one meeting. (The population, according the U.S. Census Bureau dropped 11. 6 percent from the 1,761 in 2000 to the 2010 figure.)

It was also stressed that what was being talked about was a vision, not a plan. And it was reiterated that more meetings, discussions, input and other visions are being sought.

The North Lake Tahoe Resort Association expects to have information about the vision on its website.

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (8)
  1. Dogula says - Posted: September 29, 2012

    A hotel where the Safeway is? And where will the locals get food? At the one crummy grocery store at the other end of town?
    Seems a bit short-sighted, really.

  2. Steve says - Posted: September 29, 2012

    But how can they accomplish this without a city council and a city and all of its bureaucrats and officials? Where will they put the Hole? How will they plow and repair the streets?

  3. DAVID DEWITT says - Posted: September 29, 2012

    Where in hell is Tahoe City ??

  4. Biggerpicture says - Posted: September 29, 2012

    David, it’s that side of the lake that has nothing but docks and rocks! South Shore has some of the best beaches in the world!

  5. Loves Tahoe Too says - Posted: September 29, 2012

    Tahoe City needs help and some increased height is fine if it doesn’t extend the entire length of town, but 5 stories on the lakeside is out of the question – particularly if it also comes with the bulk that would happen if the entire Lighthouse Center became a hotel property. Doubt that the economics of moving Safeway across the street will pencil out and what about the post office? No extra funds there to finance a new development.

    The past 15 years has seen a slow (and not so slow) decline and if nothing changes then the decline will continue. Change is good, but it still has to embody the character of a little town in the mountains next to a spectacular lake.The Lake is what will distinguish Tahoe City from Squaw Valley and Northstar and increasing access to it in all ways is a great way to ground the redevelopment concept.

  6. Todd Chaponot says - Posted: September 29, 2012

    Thanks for the update Kay. The powerpoint presentation that the Design Workshop consultants put together is also located online – with details about alternatives that were presented at the meeting, and are being considered.

    http://www.nltra.org/documents/pdfs/TC-vision-charrette-2.pdf

    – T

  7. Local Yokle says - Posted: September 30, 2012

    I’m sorry but $35k for a plan with no funding, knowing they are in a stream zone with TRPA lurking… They may as well plan an International Airport on the side of the mountain. Add to this no comments on what the Draw to Tahoe City might be?

    Why do people go to Tahoe City? To shop, get food & gas and then go to their vacation rental? The ski areas are not there, better beaches are elsewhere, driving through town is a nightmare and the ‘malls’ are all old and outdated. Gone are the days when the Boatworks Mall held any draw muchless the other shops in town. They need a plan but without money and backing what is the point?

    My Two Cents
    -Local Yokle

  8. Wally Auerbach says - Posted: October 10, 2012

    The constraints of SEZ and TRPA are no reason to sit back and do nothing. Is there really a sentiment out there that says we can do nothing forever and still keep the quaint look of Tahoe City? Is the Pepper Tree quaint? It’s 7 stories! Lighthouse Mall is at least three stories on the Lake already. Have we all become so used to what we see that we can’t picture anything else? I hope not.