Scooters on collision course with walkers, lawmakers
By Jim Sallis, The Conversation
Electric scooters are appearing in many major cities across the country, including South Lake Tahoe, bringing fun to riders, profits to scooter makers – and lots of potential risks to walkers and riders.
San Diego, where I live, is at the forefront of the proliferation of electric rideables, and as a physical activity researcher I am an interested observer. Recently, I was enjoying a stroll on the boardwalk when a couple of electric scooters zoomed past. As I saw a young girl start walking across the boardwalk, another scooter zipped by, and I could tell it would not be able to stop in time. The young woman riding the scooter was able to act quickly. Instead of crashing into the girl at full speed, she fell down with the scooter and slid to a stop. There was a crash and minor injuries to the rider, but a tragedy was avoided.
I consider this event a warning about the dangers posed by the electric vehicles that have rapidly become commonplace on local boardwalks and sidewalks. An online search will reveal many reports of injuries. A Dallas woman went to the emergency room for head injuries the week of July 9, and officials in Nashville are considering legislation there that would require registration for scooters.
Several issues emerge from this new mode of transportation, including whether riders should be required to wear helmets and whether the vehicles should be allowed on sidewalks. And, should drivers be permitted to use them while under the influence? I want to warn local government leaders, electric-rideable companies, and users of sidewalks about the three ways that electric scooters can harm health.
How electric rideables can harm health
Have the rideables come to your neighborhood yet? They will. A market research company predicted electric scooters alone will grow from a $14 billion global market in 2014 to $37 billion in 2024. Bird and Lime, the two biggest scooter makers and both based in California, have placed scooters in nearly 30 U.S. cities in recent months, leasing them to riders seeking a thrill – or an alternative to ride-sharing.
There are many variations of one-, two-, three- and four-wheeled vehicles that share one major flaw. They all go too fast. Scooters go 15 mph, and electric skateboards, mini-motorcycles and one-wheeled devices can go faster.
The problem is that pedestrians walk 3-4 miles per hour, or slower. This means scooters are traveling four times as fast. If there is a clear path, the riders are going at full speed, because that is where the fun and thrills are. But considering the speed, weight of the devices and weight of the rider (sometimes two riders), the result is a dangerous force.
In a collision, the pedestrian will always be the loser. Putting these speeding motorized vehicles alongside pedestrians is a disaster waiting to happen. I could not find much data on injuries from electric rideables, but a study using the U.S. National Electronic Injury Surveillance System reported 26,854 injuries to children from hoverboards alone in 2015 and 2016.
A second way that electric rideables can harm health is by reducing walking. Ads for the devices claim they reduce car trips and carry public transit riders the first and last mile of trips.
But do they? I challenge the companies to provide evidence about this. Based on my observations, the devices mainly replace walking with riding. And it is well documented that low physical activity is one of the biggest health threats worldwide, being a major contributor to epidemics of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancers, dementia, etc.
The third way electric rideables can harm health is by making sidewalks hostile territory for pedestrians. Though scooters and other rideables are not allowed on the sidewalks, almost all the rides I see are occurring on sidewalks. If speeding electric vehicles become common on sidewalks, then I predict pedestrians will stay away. Our research group based at UC San Diego has shown that the better sidewalks and street crossings are designed for pedestrian safety and comfort, the more people of all ages walk for transportation.
Thus, I am concerned that competing with electric vehicles will make sidewalks less safe and comfortable for pedestrians. The U.S. already has among the lowest rates of walking and bicycling for transportation in the world. Will we now turn over the sidewalks to electric vehicles and further reduce our activity levels?
Walking is already too dangerous. About 6,000 pedestrians were killed in 2017. The Governors Highway Safety Association reported that the number of pedestrian fatalities increased 27 percent from 2007 to 2016, while at the same time, all other traffic deaths decreased by 14 percent. Clearly, the roads are not safe for pedestrians, so shouldn’t we protect sidewalks as a safe place for walking?
A quick fix: Slow things down
Local governments are actively working on responses to this obvious new danger. The first step in San Diego has been to enforce requirements for helmets, speed and single riders on the boardwalk. I have seen no such enforcement on sidewalks just a couple of blocks away. This infographic with safety instructions for electric rideable use is a good start to education for riders.
I have some further recommendations that will support safe use of electric rideables while improving conditions for walking and bicycling.
Let’s start by declaring sidewalks the domain of pedestrians, with motorized devices limited to those used by people with disabilities (#sidewalks4pedestrians). At least on sidewalks, the rights of pedestrians should come before the rights of vehicle riders.
Electric rideables should be allowed wherever bicycles are legal, which are bike facilities, lanes, protected bike paths and on the streets, but not on sidewalks. But there’s a problem with bikes and rideables on the streets – riding on the streets is not as safe as it could be on bicycles or rideables.
I envision a win-win scenario in which electric vehicle companies and bicycle advocates join together to advocate for rapidly building networks of protected bicycle facilities that can also be used by rideables. Most U.S. cities are unsafe for bicycling, so improvements are needed. Some of the electric rideable companies have market values of more than $1 billion, so they have the capacity to lobby cities for infrastructure that will safely accommodate their products.
I expect bicycle, pedestrian, health and environmental advocates would be happy to work with electric rideable companies to achieve long-sought goals for safe bicycling that are likely to produce more bicycling, less traffic congestion, fewer carbon emissions and healthier people. The electric rideable phenomenon is very new but growing rapidly, so the need for research on electric rideables is as urgent as the need for action. We need evidence to guide policies that will ensure electric rideables do not harm health and will possibly improve health.
Jim Sallis is professorial fellow, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University; emeritus professor, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego.
What if people just want to ride them for fun. It used to be in this country you took responsibility for your actions. Someone may get hurt and someone could posdibly die. Life happens. If you want to ride a scooter do it. If you hurt yourself you learn your lesson. We don’t need extra research, don’t need a global policy, just ride one to have some fun.
It isn’t about just hurting yourself. It’s about hurting others who have no choice or control over your reckless and selfish actions. I was nearly hit by a scooter last week while waiting at a light to cross the street. I WANT my life to happen, and not in a hospital.
If that’s the reasoning we are going to use then let’s ban cars, bicycles and motorcycles. What about private and commercial planes? They can all hurt you in the same way. Why stop with just scooters? Reckless driving cuts across every vehicle. Let’s ban them all. Let’s go all the way to ensure safety for everyone everywhere everyplace.
EZ solution to start is have legislature pass a law that says the scooter rental company is liable for ALL and ANY damages to ANYONE that results while a person is riding such scooter. Let’s face it: the scooter companies KNOW riders are breaking laws while using them – just the same as OXYCONTIN distributors/manufacturer knew their users were harming themselves and others.
Comparing a scooter company to a drug company selling oxy? Really? Not even close.
What a great article. It points out a problem and offers solutions rather than the usual and unimaginative response of saying any limits will resort in wholesale bans. Yes, speed is an issues. Yes, sidewalks need to be safe places to walk. Yes, kids getting hurt matters. Let’s deal with these real problems and not pretend they don’t exist.
What we know: We know there are existing laws requiring riding on the sidewalk, a helmet and a drivers license. We know people (including kids) are getting hurt. We know we want to offer alternative modes of transportation and be proactive. We need our sidewalks to be safe for those who are walking.
Solutions: We can enforce existing laws. We can require these businesses ensure scooters are not used without a helmet and riders know the laws before they are handed out. Bike shops know better than to rent out a bike or scooter to a kid without a helmet… why should an Internet based business be held to a different level of responsibility?
These solutions need to be setup so that the business is the first line of enforcement and not our local police. If you listen to the local police radio you will hear frequent calls for VHR code enforcement as well as the occasional call for Scooter enforcement. You will hear no calls for bike rental enforcement because our local bike shops don’t allow the problem to happen in the first place. You will also not hear any calls about parking violations in motels because those problems are handled by the business first and the police only intercede when the business can not handle the issue. Why is it suddenly acceptable for similar businesses to operate over the Internet with no representative from the business to deal with these problems? Are we going to expand our police force to deal with the ever growing number of online businesses or are we going to hold these businesses to the same standards we expect of our brick and mortar businesses? It is absurd to think we can push these problems on our local law enforcement who have enough on their plate without having to deal with problems created by businesses that ignore established laws.
There are workable solutions that will allow our town to offer these services without banning them. The question remains if we are adult enough to face these problems and imaginative enough to solve them. Enjoy your scooter but please where a helmet and don’t ride on the sidewalk… Is that so hard?
We know there are laws requiring people NOT ride on sidewalks.