THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Court: Signs are a matter of free speech


image_pdfimage_print

By Hans von Spakovsky, Daily Signal

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court struck down a town’s sign ordinance as an unconstitutional, content-based regulation of speech. This ruling for free speech means the government can’t pick and choose what speech deserves more protection based on the content of the speech.

Like most other towns in America, Gilbert, Ariz., regulates when, where and how signs may be displayed around town. Temporary non-commercial signs are classified by their content, and each category has its own set of regulations.

Real estate signs, for example, may be up to 80 square feet, and political signs may be up to 32 square feet; political signs may be displayed for four and a half months before an election, including in the public right of way; and homeowners’ association event signs may be displayed for 30 days.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (8)
  1. lou Pierini says - Posted: June 21, 2015

    The new CSLT sign ordinance doesn’t meet the rulings standards, and has to be rewritten.

  2. Dogula says - Posted: June 21, 2015

    So I wonder what this means for SLT’s regulations against sandwich-board signs and such? Might make it a little easier for businesses to make themselves known when they’re not right on the highway.

  3. lou Pierini says - Posted: June 21, 2015

    Let TRPA enforce it, the city is taking on this burden and it doesn’t have to. TRPA doesn’t enforce it anywhere, only the city does.

  4. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: June 21, 2015

    Does the City Charter detail specifics of their authority? Where can someone find the Charter?

  5. Susan says - Posted: June 22, 2015

    According to the article, this ruling applies to content and still allows local governments to retain the power to “enact and enforce reasonable sign regulations.”

  6. Dogula says - Posted: June 22, 2015

    “Reasonable”?

  7. Buck says - Posted: June 22, 2015

    Nevada signs are huge compared to the cities signs and reasonable means lets go to court.