THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Safeway to pay nearly $10 mil. in hazardous waste lawsuit


image_pdfimage_print

By KCRA-TV

OAKLAND — Safeway Inc. has agreed to pay nearly $10 million in civil penalties to settle a environmental protection lawsuit filed in Oakland alleging that the grocery store chain failed to properly dispose of hazardous waste at more than 500 California facilities over seven years.

The San Francisco and Alameda County district attorney’s offices said Alameda County Superior Court Judge Wynne Carvill approved the settlement this morning after 41 district attorneys and two city attorneys filed a complaint on Wednesday.

“This investigation touched nearly every county in California, and today’s results could not have been reached without the collaborative work of the many offices involved,” Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley said in a statement.

Prosecutors alleged that Safeway sent hazardous waste including medication, aerosol cans, flammable liquids, batteries, electronic devices and other toxic materials to landfills instead of properly disposing of them.

Read the whole story

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (10)
  1. Gaspen Aspen says - Posted: January 5, 2015

    Yet the idiots at the Keys marina go untouched. What is wrong with this town?!?!

  2. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: January 5, 2015

    Who gets the money? Certainly not us the customers who will end up paying it.

  3. Dan Stroehler says - Posted: January 5, 2015

    “The violations came to the attention of district attorney’s investigators and environmental regulators when they conducted inspections of Safeway trash receptacles in 2012 and 2013, according to Alameda County prosecutors.”

    Going through the trash…really?

  4. Dogula says - Posted: January 6, 2015

    Dan, going through everybody’s trash is the future. It’s about control and revenue. It’s only a matter of time before this happens here: http://www.tpnn.com/2015/01/01/city-of-seattle-law-that-gives-garbage-collectors-new-police-like-powers-takes-effect/
    And, please, I know the usual suspects will attack the news source. The source isn’t the issue, it’s the law and the powers it gives to the trash collectors.
    Yeah, the complaint was filed Wednesday, Safeway settled on Monday? Watch what happens to grocery prices. We’ll pay. We always pay. Some of you think it’s good that the government came down on a corporation for its misdeeds, but it’s just more games. Neither government nor corporations pay; YOU do.

  5. Biggerpicture says - Posted: January 6, 2015

    Dog, just an FYI: It already happened here. Safeway along with most big businesses that operated here in town were sued over the cleanup of the Meyers Landfill (Hekpa Dump).

  6. Dogula says - Posted: January 6, 2015

    Yeah, Bigs, you’re right. I remember; they were basically extorting the guy who owns the pharmacy at the Y because he owns the building that used to poison that dump with dry cleaning toxins, even though he personally had nothing to do with it!
    Justice doesn’t enter into it when the powers decide to go after money.

  7. Say What Now? says - Posted: January 6, 2015

    Only on the LTN website would a corporation intentionally poisoning California’s land and water be turned into a diatribe about the government. The government stopped this illegal scheme and punished the criminals engaged in the harmful acts. The government is the bad guy here? What a world.

  8. nature bats last says - Posted: January 6, 2015

    Say what now, you can be assured that any reply posted by dogula, justanass(justice), gaspen aspen, and there are a few more, they all just point fingers at the government, liberal thinkers, progressive thinkers, people of color or anyone with a hispanic sir name, environmentalists, non gun lovers, jerry brown, anyone that gets a federal paycheck, anyone who gets any social benefits, dog haters, well you get the point. Its pretty predictable what you will read so dont waste your time.

  9. cosa pescado says - Posted: January 8, 2015

    “And, please, I know the usual suspects will attack the news source. ”

    Well when your source consistently publishes rubbish articles, it makes its own case in support of the conclusion that it is rubbish.

    Dumb:
    http://www.tpnn.com/2014/11/08/will-the-gaystapo-demand-that-deion-sanders-be-fired-after-his-comments-about-michael-sam/

    Readers of this site: Dumber

    Here is one poll they had on their site
    “Do you believe the left would burn a conservative at the stake if they muttered this gay slur?”

    Yes: 87%
    No: 13%

    Your source is terrible, pandering to the lowest common denominator, and their readers are overwhelmingly ignorant.
    Dawg, do you really consider this website to be a source of information or are you a troll?

  10. cosa pescado says - Posted: January 9, 2015

    Does she even know how terrible her ‘source’ is?