Recreation in S. Lake Tahoe — a game of partnerships


By Kathryn Reed

South Lake Tahoe’s recreation facilities are old and need to be overhauled.

That was the message delivered at this month’s City Council meeting by Stan Sherer, community services director.

When asked if the ball fields or rec center should be the priority, he told the council the 37-year-old recreation center needs attention first.

South Lake Tahoe is recruiting partners to keep its recreation programs viable. Photo/LTN file

In his staff report, Sherer wrote, “The major items that need to be addressed include: The locker rooms need to be remodeled, the weight room needs to be expanded and new equipment needs to be purchased. It could be an asset to the efforts to attract high altitude training camps. The gym floor needs to be replaced.”

However, there is no capital improvement program for these facilities. And these facilities, while tourists use them, are a huge draw for locals.

Those in the tourism sector beating the recreation drum as a reason to visit the South Shore don’t seem to have looked at all the facilities to know that what tourists are likely to find are in many ways substandard entities from what they are used to.

In his report to the council, Sherer said he would like to see, “A multiuse athletic complex that could host large athletic events at one location (to) enhance our ability to secure future events. When coupled with the attraction of our natural environment and the other recreation opportunities in the area, the complex would become a regional-national draw for athletic tournaments and special events. Obviously, the complex would also enhance the recreational opportunities for our local community.”

Community field

Sherer predicts the community ball field by Lake Tahoe Community College will need to be replaced in two years. That field was dedicated June 23, 2005.

Steve Weiss, former director of the city’s parks department and current member of the Measure R ball fields committee, said at the committee meeting last week that the seams coming up at that field are a result of how much action the artificial turf is subjected to.

Sherer said part of the problem with the seams is they were never properly glued. The manufacturer was out of business two years after it was put in.

That field has endured an unusual amount of scrutiny in the last few months because it is where the three-day SnowGlobe music festival was staged and people believe that contributed to the degradation of the field.

Recreation officials say otherwise – that the lifespan of the field is nearing its natural end.

While Weiss said he was at the field April 19 when a truckload of debris was sucked out of the carpet, Sherer told the council this is the first time the field has had such a cleaning since it was laid down.

Weiss also said, “I would deem it a playable field.”

To replace the field, Sherer estimates it will cost between $700,000 and $900,000.

From Measure S/R the city receives $50,000 to maintain that field and will continue to until the bond expires in 2030.

Each year the three jurisdictions that are part of the recreation bond report their Measure S/R expenditures to the oversight board. In July 2011, when the last report was made, it was noted the city had received $300,000 for the field, of which $162,059.11 had been spent.

It’s possible those remaining funds would go toward replacement costs.

According to John Upton, staff member for the recreation JPA, “The original bond had not been sufficient to construct the restroom/concession building at the site. In addition, the JPA has disbursed $202,500 to the city for that purpose, of which $187,484.99 had been spent.”

Any revenues generated from that field go into the city’s coffers.

Lake Tahoe News in an email dated April 29 asked:

Who makes money off this field? What is the revenue to public entities — and what are those amounts — and the entities? And what is the revenue to private and/or nonprofit entities — and what are those amounts — and what are the entities?

Sherer and Upton were on that email. Upton deferred to Sherer because the JPA has nothing to do with revenue from the field. Sherer never responded.

Other recreation items

The city will see some new revenue this summer from various contracts it will have with vendors that didn’t exist before. StandUp Paddle will rent equipment and store non-motorized watercraft at Lakeview Commons.

A food vendor is being sought for Regan Beach and Lakeview Commons, the latter being a new revenue stream.

In the last year with budget cuts, the rec department has lost five of its six staff members. To keep services going partnerships have been formed.

Lake Tahoe Boys & Girls Club is helping with youth programs. The senior center is sharing facilities with El Dorado County. A master’s swim class through Lake Tahoe Community College has been added. The Red Cross is handling lifeguard training and certification.

“Our goal is to create partnerships in an effort to avoid duplication of services provide by local agencies and identify new programming opportunities to increase the diversity in what is offered,” Sherer wrote in the staff report.





About author

This article was written by admin


Comments (10)
  1. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: May 6, 2012

    The pool locker rooms, showers etc, look like they have been patched together in a hodge podge way for many years, it functions enough, but not efficiently,and aesthetically appeasing in the least!

    The pool seems to get closed a lot, so maybe that system could use some updating.

    Would be nice to have a large hot tub ;)

  2. Rhonda McFarlane says - Posted: May 6, 2012

    I love being able to swim at the rec center pool. It’s not fancy, but many of us are grateful to have it. The pool’s water quality/cleanliness is excellent and the City staff at the pool are terrific.

  3. Kathy Compton says - Posted: May 6, 2012

    I think this place is nice ,I love the swimming pool .and the people are sweet to ,thank you Lake Tahoe.

  4. tony colombo says - Posted: May 6, 2012

    seems like grass seed is far more economical than a new 700-900 thousand dollar ball field… lets exercise due diligence on future expenditures on suppliers or contractors for business solvency and economic stability. does it have to take a village idiot to run this town?

  5. Louis says - Posted: May 6, 2012

    Tony, the way I remember it, that field was supposed to have been big enough for two soccer fields. That’s what I voted for. But somehow it got changed to an artificial turf, which cost more but would save a few hundred thousand gallons of water. STPUD put up some money for the “upgrade”. But since it cost more, we only got one field.

    But don’t worry our representatives are going to take care of this all for us. I’m sure it’ll be cheap to dig out the entire field, dispose of it, find dirt to fill it with (I’m sure there is plenty from the hole someplace), run water, and lay sod. Basically build a whole new field, no problem, its other people’s money anyway right? No need to ask the grand jury to look into any of this.

  6. snoheather says - Posted: May 6, 2012

    $50,000.00 to maintain the field. Is this per year? Really?1? It should be in tiptop shape then.

  7. Chip says - Posted: May 7, 2012

    In the long run it was cheaper for artificial turf. If it was grass, you wouldn’t be able to schedule as much usage (the high school football grass was used only for that, no HS soccer, nothing else), the increased use of water and fertilizer (we need to have grey water capabilities), and from what I heard, the fake grass put a few more years into some of the older athletes knees. Yes, the initial outlay was more, but we got a lot more usage out of it with much less maintenance needed.

  8. Sunriser2 says - Posted: May 8, 2012

    The streets are turning to mud.

    The city failed to fund the retiree’s insurance fund.

    The city employee’s pension fund is underfunded.

    The city recreation facilities are falling apart.

    What did the city do with all the money during the largest increase in revenue in history between 1999-2008?

  9. lou pierini says - Posted: May 8, 2012

    STPUD has the college well, about 100 feet from the field, that’s not in use because the water exceeds state max. levels for uranimun, it does meet federal standards. There would be very little cost for water just O an M. The well is very productive, 1500 gallons per minute, enough for more than 10 fields watered at the same time. Put in grass.