THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

SLT-EDC eager to resolve land dispute


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

It looks like South Lake Tahoe may soon be the landowner where the senior center, museum, art building and visitors center sit in the middle of town.

“It’s a good idea to transfer it to the city and get out of the middle,” El Dorado County Supervisor Sue Novasel told Lake Tahoe News.

This month, just not tomorrow, Novasel expects the county electeds to vote on how best to have the city take over that land. Whether this involves the transfer of money or land, or changing property lines remains to be seen.

“We hope there is no money exchanged. We hope there is a lot line adjustment,” Mayor Hal Cole told Lake Tahoe News.

This conversation has gone on for decades, but not until this year has any real progress been made. Timing and new players at staff level and elected positions are part of the reason a resolution is apt to be found.

“We are not coming in with any predisposed biases about what to do with property. We are looking at how to make it work, not how to stop it. That seems to be the spirit of everyone at the table,” Novasel said.

The land where these entities do business may be transferred from El Dorado County to South Lake Tahoe. Photo/LTN

The land where these entities do business may be transferred from El Dorado County to South Lake Tahoe. Photo/LTN

The other impetus is the seniors. Their complaints are finally being acknowledged by the city and county.

A big issue is that the county owns the land that houses all of these entities, while the city is responsible for the maintenance. In many ways it’s like the organizations have two landlords who aren’t always in agreement.

The seniors want to make repairs and expand, but the city doesn’t want to say yes to a building it doesn’t own and the county has essentially been an absentee landlord. Lingering disagreements are whether issues are maintenance or capital improvements. The former the city would be liable for, the latter would be the county’s responsibility.

The City Attorney’s Office did not provide Lake Tahoe News with what the actual lease agreements are between the city and the seniors, Tahoe Art League, Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority and Lake Tahoe Historical Society.

All of the property is part of what is known as the 56 Acres, which includes the $65 million Lakeview Commons site.

The county owns a slice of land no more than 100 feet by 100 feet near the old Alta Mira building site that the city would like to acquire in order to get the bike path there built. That, too, is on the table for discussion.

Moving the county’s vector control is also being considered. It’s possible that department could be relocated to the industrial area when the city takes its fleet there.

The larger parcel of the 56 acres includes Campground by the Lake and undeveloped areas on that side of the highway.

“We expressed our desire to take that land and add it into our recreation master plan, possibly improve the campground and bring it up to standard like the rest rooms and possibly RV hookups to make it more desirable,” Councilman Austin Sass told Lake Tahoe News.

What to do with this bigger parcel, including the campground, is not expected to be resolved this year.

Once the Board of Supervisors votes on the senior center property et al, the City Council will take up the issue. The goal is to have votes cast this calendar year. The city, though, only has one meeting left – Dec. 7.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (5)
  1. Irish Wahini says - Posted: November 9, 2015

    Hope to see the City take over the land where the Senior Center is. In the past, the County has moved in non-compatible agencies (i.e., Mental Health, Substance Control) which made the long-term tenants very uncomfortable about their safety. The entire 56-acre project should offer a cohesive community and recreation offering.

  2. Robin Smith says - Posted: November 9, 2015

    Reading through the comments to recall Sue Novasel I see that OLS:(RIP) said he would sign the recall.

    I see so many supporters of OLS sending nice words of condolence to his family and LTN readers I am surprised if she gets support to continue doing City business such as she puts it, “getting out of the middle” of the City and County business.

  3. Roger Berger says - Posted: November 9, 2015

    This dispute has become a clog in the wheel of progress for the Senior Center. The Seniors simply want a location they can utilize for the various activities and celebrations the meet for. Why its taken so long is an issue that has created conflict between both entities. I am hopeful that this matter can be resolved as soon as possible and we can put all the “He said” “They said” in the closet.

    Chairman
    El Dorado County Commission on Aging

  4. JOAN YOUNG says - Posted: November 10, 2015

    Dick wants to know; Does anyone have clear title to the 56 acres?

  5. Isee says - Posted: November 10, 2015

    It’s our supervisors job to represent the county residents – not to” get out the middle” with a gigantic give-away of valuable real estate. As a county resident, I’d like to see the county keep ownership and take back the responsibility of the 56 acres. This is high dollar real estate and should be considered a great asset. How many more things can the county get out of doing for it’s residents, anyway? Time after time over many years the county has made arrangements for the city to handle things to no benefit or consideration of county (only) residents. Because the city can’t represent for non-constituents, it makes no sense in reality.