THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Letter: STPUD explains rate structure


image_pdfimage_print

To the community,

In response to the letter from Mr. (Mark) Allione, the district would like to offer some information.

Based upon the Proposition 218 notice last year, the maximum rate increase over the three-year period shown in the graph that a typical single family residence may experience (6.5 percent for water, 6 percent for sewer), is 20 percent for the combined quarterly bill. This is assuming a three sewer unit home (two bathrooms). Of course, metered customers could see a somewhat higher increase if they increase their consumption.

As part of the district’s annual budget preparation, staff verifies water and sewer rates with other public agencies around the lake and on the West Slope of El Dorado County. This ensures that our comparison figures are accurate. The district continues to be the lowest cost water and sewer service provider in the area.

One issue that was raised repeatedly was second homeowner rates. Under the district’s unmetered, flat rate system, second homeowners were charged the same for water and sewer as a full-time resident. This was based upon the requirement to build the systems with enough capacity to serve the demand when every residence was occupied. In addition, the maximum capacity for the water system was always dictated by fire flow requirements, so fire protection could be in place whether structures were occupied or not. District boards also chose to make needed improvements to the firefighting infrastructure a higher priority than installing water meters due to the threat of forest fires in the basin, and the basin not being in a critically short water area. Now that the state is requiring water meters, the district is installing them on every residence over the next five years.

With meters being installed, the board needed to choose a service charge rate including a base charge and consumptive charge for metered customers. The board chose an 80-20 service charge rate, meaning 80 percent from the base charge covers the fixed costs required to provide the water service before any usage and 20 percent from the consumptive charge covers the costs that vary with the amount of water produced and delivered.

Fixed costs include:

• Capital infrastructure programs of the meters themselves

• All of the firefighting infrastructure

• Replacement of pipe and equipment that degrade based upon the effects of age (corrosion from both the outside and inside)

• Replacement of equipment to meet new regulations such as air quality standards

• Functions of staff for customer service system operation and maintenance.

Varying costs include:

• Chemicals

• Power

• Wearing out of rotating mechanic and electrical equipment.

Although the 80-20 rate structure accurately reflects the fixed and variable cost structure of the district, this split means that as a customer reduces their water consumption, it will only impact up to a maximum reduction of 20 percent compared to the district’s flat rate charge.

Several affects result from this:

 

• It does not send as strong a water conservation message as a higher percentage on the usage would

• It does not end up costing high users as much as a more even split

• It means that if customers accomplish the 20 percent reduction in water consumed as the state of California has required, the district will not have to impose an additional increase in rates as many other agencies in California are having to do since expenses will decrease equally compared to revenue.

Additional information can be found on our website. A public meeting to discuss the budget and proposed rate increases is also scheduled for May 7 at 6pm at the district headquarters at 1275 Meadow Crest Drive in South Lake Tahoe.

Richard Solbrig, South Tahoe PUD general manager

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (14)
  1. Judy says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    Am so tired of the yearly “justifications” for rate increases.

  2. Dogula says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    Odd; there’s no mention there of supporting the board members and retirees, or the highest salaries for current workers in town.
    Isn’t that part of the equation?

  3. legal beagle says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    As south lake Tahoe is awash in underground water, why Richard would you impose sanctions against users.
    Does the truth hurt that much?
    Also part timers water their plant life as much as any full time resident so they essential use almost as much water as any other customer of STPUD.

  4. Dan Wilvers says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    80/20 split makes sense between base and consumptive.

    One question Richard, since the consumptive is variable, and as more customers come on line, is there the possibilty the consumptive rate will go down?

    Thanks

  5. tony colombo says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    I have a meter, my neighbor does not. He washes his driveway, I do not.

  6. Moral Hazard says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    What Solbrig doesn’t tell you is that the 80/20 split still has permanent homeowners subsidizing second homeowners. The cost of water is basically free in Tahoe. There is the electrical and chemicals, but that aint much.

    Rather the cost of water in Tahoe is the cost of pipes. That is not a variable cost. And here is where Solbrig is lying by omission, the fixed costs of having pipes run in front of the house are higher than the proposed base fee.

    Think about that, if the cost of pipes is greater than the cost being proposed; who is paying for that?

    Yes, us locals who actually use water.

  7. Irish Wahini says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    I know at least one worker who does not have a college education, who makes about $40 per hour plus full benefits! It is very hard to make that salary in the Bay Area unless you are working for the high-tech or pharma business & have degrees! And, while my home is a 2nd home, I do not use the same amount of water as locals – I do not have any plants other than the hardy-drought-resistent ones in my yard – and none inside. So, fewer showers, laundry, dishes, etc…..

    Check those salaries STPUD! They are way out of whack!

  8. Moral Hazard says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    Irish it that person is a master pipefitter then its a bargain.

    They aren’t flipping burgers or working in your career.

  9. Isee says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    “It does not end-up costing high end users as much as a more even split” Why are you proud of that, Dick?
    This is the way STPUD talks to it’s ratepayers– by responding in print to accusations made in print. This is a pattern – I’d hoped they’d stop after retiring their HIGHLY paid PR person. And of course, no mention in the article of over- the- top pay and benefits. Benefits for the few at the expense of the (hurting) many.

  10. A Thought says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    It’s their employee union that’s financially killing us, most are over paid and not worth the money they earn, even for low skilled jobs they are paid to much along with the perks. Solbrig has ALWAYS turned a blind eye with the conduct of some of his very bad work ethic employee’s!
    I’ve seen it with my own eyes on numerous occasions.

    Want the rates to stop rising, then break their union and get hard working employee’s for half the wage that would love to have the job instead!

    I believe almost everyone is onto STPUD and it’s “good ole boy” club they have over there.

  11. Steve buttling says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    No mention here of the way single bathroom homes are charged the same as dual bathroom homes .”that’s just the way we do it “duh !!!!!!
    At least there was some kind of reply to concerns voiced here.
    But once again just a lot of justification for whatever STPUD wants to charge.

  12. dumbfounded says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    Condescending tripe, IMHO.

  13. Parker says - Posted: March 19, 2015

    So in other words there isn’t a good reason for our rates to keep going up! Just a bunch of babble to justify STPUD’s excessive pay/benefit package. Plus some excessive travel expenses.

  14. Toxic Warrior says - Posted: March 20, 2015

    I believe STPUD does a great job with the water and sewer service. The regular employees are all very experienced and truly dedicated to precision in their fields. The infrastructure ( especially water line replacement ) is in desperate need of continued replacement and upgrading to meet our needs not only now but for future growth and fire protection. It would be interesting to see if the district’s bulk water users are paying the same rate hike and if they’re being limited for usage with this drought.
    But the District certainly could use a fair amount of streamlining ( fat trimming ) in management salaries and endless positions. ( Top Heavy )
    The board should explore the Chiefs to Indians ratio more carefully and make some adjustments.