THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Heavenly eyes epic construction season to begin evolution into year-round resort


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

STATELINE – Going forward, Heavenly Mountain Resort will no longer be known as a just a ski resort. Its Epic Discovery project received unanimous approval from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Governing board on Thursday.

“It’s conceivable if all the pieces fall into place, we could break ground on a handful of projects this summer,” Heavenly General Manager Pete Sonntag told Lake Tahoe News moments after the vote.

Still needing to be secured are approval from Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and the final record of decision from the U.S. Forest Service.

Sonntag would not put a price tag on what will ultimately be a multi-million dollar endeavor.

Epic Discovery is Vail Resorts answer to creating year-round resorts. It is developing these adventure parks at Heavenly, and in Colorado at Vail and Breckenridge.

Heavenly's summer offerings are about to explode with Epic Discovery's approval. Photo/Carolyn Wright/Copyright

Heavenly’s summer offerings are about to explode with Epic Discovery’s approval. Photo Copyright 2015 Carolyn E. Wright

It’s possible some of the activities will be accessible in the winter. It will allow Heavenly to be more of a year-round destination, though there will still be times when it will have to close. Annual maintenance to the gondola starts every September, which is why scenic rides are limited to weekends and then it is offline the entire month of October.

With the Forest Service in 2011 allowing ski resorts to expand recreation opportunities into the summer, ski areas started to turn their attention to things like ropes and canopy courses, alpine coasters and mountain biking. But the Forest Service is keeping a close eye on this transformation.

“We’ve required a phased construction to make sure we consider the effects on the natural environment,” Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Forest Supervisor Jeff Marsolais told the board. The USFS also wants to see designs when they are 30 and 60 percent complete to ensure they meet all the regulations.

Because these types of projects on national lands are new and some of the components are not standard protocol, Marsolais’ bosses in Washington weighed in on some items.

An issue that was raised through comments was how the proposed Panorama Trail would impact Van Sickle Bi-state Park.

The Forest Service, Heavenly, Tahoe Rim Trail Association and Tahoe Area Mountain Biking Association created an agreement to monitor the effects over time.

“This is a different way of doing business,” Marsolais said of the adaptive management plan.

One thing he put the kibosh on was the proposed coaster in Sky Meadows because of the stream environmental zone, pine marten habitat and potential effects on skiing.

Andrew Strain, govern affairs guru for Heavenly, said the hub of the non-skiing fun will remain at Adventure Peak near the top of the gondola.

“We will be using developed areas of the ski resort,” he said.

Heavenly will greatly expand beyond the ropes courses it opened last summer. Much of what will be constructed will continue to be off the ground fun.

The mountain bike park will be outside the basin on the Nevada side.

“Heavenly today is essentially the black hole of mountain biking,” Strain said. Trails will connect to already established routes are that mostly known by locals.

For those who are a little less adventuresome or may have physical limits there will be tours of the mountain on existing roads via Heavenly vehicles.

Twenty people spoke at the March 26 meeting; all were in favor of the project.

(El Dorado County Supervisor Sue Novasel recused herself because her daughter works for Vail Resorts in Colorado. This was her choosing even though legally she did not have to.)

Many of the comments underscored how this will allow Heavenly to hire people year-round. The economic impact has not been quantified, but many business owners see Epic Discovery as a potential boon to their bottom line by people extending their visits because there will be more to do on the South Shore.

Plus, it’s in alignment with the desire of turning the region into a recreation destination.

Several people praised the educational component of the project; with the hope people will be better stewards of the land.

It was also pointed out that for many tourists this would be their first encounter with national forest land. It’s an opportunity to educate them about what grows and lives in the forest, as well as the threat of fire.

Heavenly sees about 110,000 people on the mountain now during the summer and expects to increase that by about 50 percent. Traffic and parking are not expected to be an issue because the thinking is people who are already in town will be the users and this will not be destination unto itself.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (15)
  1. Steve says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    A campground, hiking, mountain biking would be understandable, but hard to believe how a roller coaster and associated attractions would be considered the highest, best, and most appropriate use of protected Forest Service wilderness land owned by the public.

  2. Cautious and Skeptical says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    AGREED! At the very least the USFS wants it phased and I truly hope they do determine that too many amusements are planned!

  3. Hmmm... says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    Disney Taho’….they can use Britney spears as their spokesperson!

  4. Tom says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    Why is everything that Vail does labeled “epic”? Can’t you already hike and mountain bike up there since it’s forest service land? If I wanted to ride my bike up round-a-bout to the top of the face would that be OK?
    I’ve done it in the past but have also done it and been told by Heavenly employee’s that I can’t be on the mountain.

  5. Buck says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    Where do the 220,000 people park in the summer?

  6. Irish Wahini says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    Did I miss something? Or, maybe it was discussed at the hearing?…. I did not read anything about a roller-coaster being built at Heavenly. (or anything like Disneyland rides). I think this is exciting and I hope that good paying jobs will come with all of it.

    I think Zermatt, Switzerland has a system to limit cars in town, have parking outside of town & provide transportation to and in town. Ultimately, it might be nice to have visitor parking at the airport with neat local transportation (such as maybe rail, funicular, skyways, etc.). Too much coffee for me this morning…?

  7. ljames says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    “Traffic and parking are not expected to be an issue because the thinking is people who are already in town will be the users and this will not be destination unto itself.”

    It’s interesting that some folks are expressing doubts, and I have them too. If the above came from what came Vail Inc said, then even they clearly expect to mostly take business away from other commercial interests, such as the local bike shops that already rent mountain bikes or restaurants and shops that compete with Heavenly’s.

    Why can Heavenly get an “epic” expansion, and the Forest Service here in Tahoe will not even consider, let alone give, any new, even if the most low impact outfitter guide permits? Try to get a permit to lead a commercial hike or bike tour even if your group size in 4-6 and you are using established trails? Could it be that Vail Inc has the right lawyers and lobbyists in the right places?

    Vail Inc has always been able to promote what is good for Vail as good for your community, and that is a stretch to say the least. What is also interesting is what this tells you about Vail Inc’s perspective on long-term climate and weather projections.

  8. Rick says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    Buck, maybe there is something in one of the documents that suggest there will be 220,000 visitors, but based on the article we are responding to, a 50% increase of 110,000 would total 165,000. 220,000 is a 100% increase.

    I am fine with Vail expanding summer services, most Ski Resorts elsewhere do so and about time Heavenly join the party. Yes, they are looking out for themselves (what Corps do), but it is hard to argue that this won’t also spill over to some local business’ also.

    Rick

  9. reloman says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    Buck, they will park the same places all of the winter skiers have parked thru the years.

  10. Garry Bowen says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    If, as has been said by both Pete Sonntag & Andrew Strain, that this paves the way for some worthy winter employees (now “iffy”) can become year-round members of a ‘year-round’ local economy, the community will indeed be better off, as the long-relied upon gaming industry can no longer BE relied upon. . .

    This may be only a step in a process of rebuilding “Tahoe’s fortunes”. . .

    The days of half-carpentry/half-ski patrol are now long gone. . . so a recalibration of what it means to live in a ski town is of course vitally necessary. . .

  11. Inyo wife says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    steve in the front row, there are 3 wilderness areas around the tahoe basin and Heavenly is far from one of them. They allowed plety of time for you to officially input your comment to the USFS.

  12. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: March 27, 2015

    Ljames,
    “they clearly expect to mostly take business away from other commercial interests, such as the local bike shops that already rent mountain bikes or restaurants and shops that compete with Heavenly’s.”

    Lift assisted mtn biking has very focused equipment that differs from many cycling applications. Last time I checked, Vail did not own the bicycle rental business below the gondola. High end (guessing retail value in excess of $2K) mtn bikes focused more for lift assisted downhilling should increase at all shops around here.

  13. mike mulligan says - Posted: April 1, 2015

    How about finally dealing with the the California base lodge, the worst lodge in the entire ski industry. It’s an embarassment.

  14. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: April 2, 2015

    Mike Mulligan,
    Maybe the California Lodge was a very huge asset at one time. With warmer winters, I’m guessing it has lost its prestige as the once great 1932 V8 Ford excelled in its day too. BUT, there will most likely be significant new development around that lodge in the next few years that can be a game changer.

  15. karenmith says - Posted: April 8, 2015

    They need to put in a lift that eliminates the use of the very dangerous and very unpopular stairways at the top of the gondola!! I have been skiing at heavenly for 37yrs and three weeks ago I had a freak fall on dreaded stairs. The very unforgiving, metal stairs with teeth for traction??Haha! got me slipping and falling down at least 3 stairs before I stopped–landing on my knees!! Seemed ok until I got home and found I had been bleeding pretty good and I had a huge deep gash in my knee–through my tights and heavy ski pants and a knee sleeve and lightweight knee brace!! seemed ok until 5 days later I ended up at Barton with a good infection—a week before my son’s wedding no less. Heavenly–wake up–people hate the stairs–and with little kids, equipment in hand and at days end for sure climbing those stairs sucks for me–you know our visitors really hate them…spend some $ that will do everyone some good