THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

U.S. rethinks giving excess military gear to police


image_pdfimage_print

By Tami Abdollah and Eric Tucker, AP

WASHINGTON — After a decade of sending military equipment to civilian police departments across the country, federal officials are reconsidering the idea in light of the violence in Ferguson, Missouri.

The public has absorbed images of heavily armed police, snipers trained on protesters and tear gas plumes. Against that backdrop, Attorney General Eric Holder said that when police and citizens need to restore calm, “I am deeply concerned that the deployment of military equipment and vehicles sends a conflicting message.”

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said police responses like that in Ferguson have “become the problem instead of the solution.” Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., said he will introduce legislation to reverse police militarization.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said his committee will review the program to determine if the Defense Department’s surplus equipment is being used as intended.

One night after the violence that accompanied the presence of military-style equipment in Ferguson, tensions eased when a police captain, unprotected and shaking hands, walked through a crowd in a gesture of reconciliation. The contrast added to perception that the tanks and tear gas had done more harm than good.

As the country concludes its longest wartime period, the military has turned over thousands of surplus weapons and armored trucks to local police who often trained alongside the military.

A report by the American Civil Liberties Union in June said police agencies had become “excessively militarized,” with officers using training and equipment designed for the battlefield on city streets. The report found the amount of goods transferred through the military surplus program rose from $1 million in 1990 to nearly $450 million in 2013.

“Every police force of any size in this country has access to those kinds of weapons now,” said David Harris, a police expert at the University of Pittsburgh law school. “It makes it more likely to be used (and) is an escalation all by itself.”

In Louisiana, masked police in full body armor carrying AR-15 assault rifles raided a nightclub without a warrant, looking not for terrorists but underage drinkers and fire-code violations. Officers in California train using the same counterinsurgency tactics as those used in Afghanistan.

“They’re not coming in like we’re innocent until proven guilty,” said Quinn Eaker. SWAT teams last August raided his organic farm and community, the Garden of Eden, in Arlington, Texas. “They’re coming in like: ‘We’re gonna kill you if you move a finger.'”

Police found no drugs or weapons and filed no charges after their search, which authorities said followed standard procedure.

In 1990, Congress authorized the Pentagon to give surplus equipment to police to help fight drugs, which then gave way to the fight against terrorism. Though violent crime nationwide is at its lowest level in generations and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have largely concluded, the military transfers have increased.

Police say the equipment, which includes free body armor, night vision goggles and scopes, keeps officers safe and prepares them for the worst case.

“A lot evolved from the military, no question,” said Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Chief Bill McSweeney, who heads the detective division. “Is it smart for them to use that stuff and perhaps look like soldiers from Iraq going into a place? Is that smart or over the top? I’d say generally that’s smart. Now, if you use that every time a guy is writing bad checks, that’s getting rather extreme.”

The U.S. has provided 610 mine-resistant armored trucks, known as MRAPs, across the country, nearly all since August 2013, including at least nine in Los Angeles County, according to Michelle McCaskill, a spokeswoman for the Defense Logistics Agency.

In rural western Maine, the Oxford County Sheriff’s Office, which had not reported a murder in more than 20 years, asked for an MRAP. Cpl. George Cayer, wrote in his request that Maine’s western foothills face a “previously unimaginable threat from terrorist activities.”

In Orange County, Florida, masked officers in tactical gear helped state inspectors raid barber shops in 2010 to find people cutting hair without a license. Using a mini battering ram and pry bar at times, police arrested dozens of people. Officials said they found illegal items such as drugs and a weapon.

McSweeney said it’s hard to argue that police shouldn’t use the best equipment available.

“It’s tempting to say, ‘Shouldn’t we wear these things? Shouldn’t we approach this as if we could get shot?'” he said. “How do you say no to that question?”

Nick Gragnani, executive director of the St. Louis Area Regional Response System, said such supplies have proved essential in hurricane relief efforts and other disaster responses.

“The shame of it will be … if somebody does a brushstroke and takes out all the funding and then we can no longer be prepared for that big incident,” he said.

The LAPD’s deputy chief, Michael Downing, who heads the department’s counterterrorism and special operations bureau, said officers are dealing with “an adversary who is more sophisticated, more tactically trained.”

Downing emphasized that though police might train with soldiers, they’re not warriors with a mission to kill but public servants with no “enemies.”

“In police work there are times we have to become soldiers and control through force and fear,” Downing said. “But we have to come back to being a public servant as quick as we can to establish that normality and that ethical stature with communities, because they’re the ones who give us the authority to do our police work.”

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (16)
  1. Tahoe John says - Posted: August 17, 2014

    Has the City’s MRAP been deployed for anything other than to sparkle at the Christmas parade? That was truly special. No better way to celebrate the birth of our Lord and Savior than with an a$$-kicking war machine!

  2. Dogula says - Posted: August 17, 2014

    They used it to serve a warrant on a parole violator too. Never can be too careful. . . /sarc

  3. Mel says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Big toys for big boys. Your tax dollars at work!

  4. sunriser2 says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    I witnessed the vehicle in traffic one day. I was overcome with a strange feeling that they were not on our side. More like an occupying force.

    This is the first time I understood how the people in low income high crime areas think about law enforcement.

  5. Know Bears says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    I begin to understand why civilians want to own assault rifles — not that I agree with them. I just understand it a little better. Not good.

  6. Biggerpicture says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Personally I’m more worried about the general public being armed with military assault weapons. The way I see it is that law enforcement must have the proper weaponry to deal with those akin to the folks who attached themselves to the Clive Bundy fiasco.

  7. observer says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    A good example of the time honored adage

    Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.

    The fact is our police in the US are very fond of using whatever they have on ordinary citizens who may just be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    How many roadside beatings of women (by our vaunted CHP!), tasering of school children, beating to death wheel chair bound homeless people, shooting of unarmed people not guilty of violence etc etc can you see or hear about and not realize that these so-called PEACE OFFICERS DO NOT need further enhancement of their ability to inflict mayhem on citizens.

    Violence simply and plainly encourages more violence.

  8. go figure says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Observer, your comment that violence begets more violence is the premesis used by the NRA that the way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Violence is awful and so are guns. It would be nice to have a world with neither…

  9. Catch-release says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Go Figure: So are you saying when an armed idiot is drawing down on you, you are going to talk him out of killing you? Because you are not armed, you will be killed. Not sure I get it. Yes, violence sucks but is a reality. There will always be locusts that want to take and kill. I’d like to have the edge on those insects rather than be a victim.

    Observer: The Police are reacting to the threat so prevalent now in our violent society. If you don’t believe that….walk a mile in their shoes and then report back. AND if some citizen is at the wrong place at the wrong time, they need to recognize that and leave….or face what is going on. They have a choice to leave.

  10. Biggerpicture says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    C+R are you talking about the armed idiots that keep getting away with murder by virtue of the stand your ground laws in some states? And even if armed wouldn’t I want to try and get myself away from a bad situation as opposed to feeling empowered by virtue of carrying a gun?

  11. Catch-release says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Feeling empowered? Or feeling protected. ALWAYS try and get out of the situation, but if you can’t….keep the superior mindset of you WILL win and the dirt bag WILL lose. Don’t you think your family would prefer you win?

  12. Biggerpicture says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Sorry C+R, but I don’t live in a fear based reality that’s warrants carrying a weapon. And so far 50+ years into this life I have NEVER been in a situation that would warrant one. And I would have to believe that in reality the chances of me, and the majority of other people in our country, will never be in that situation. I’m not saying it couldn’t happen, but I’m thinking the odds fall my favor.

  13. Catch-release says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    No worries Bigger, I HAVE been in the situation and won! I don’t live in FEAR…only being prepared, and seeing what reality is in this society now. I hope you and your loved ones never have to face it. But if it happens I would rather be prepared, than just another victim. The choice is yours.

  14. go figure says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    I believe that the odds are in my favor that I will not be found in the situation that I would need to be carrying a loaded gun and be able to kill before being killed. Im not paranoid about that kind of stuff, nor do I find myself in the company of paranoid gun toting idiots. I think that people who are all paranoid and full of fear tend to attract those types as well. Ill keep on hopeing for peacefull outcomes and the total illimination of all guns and weapons. Yeah, I know its far fetched but thats how I roll. Now all you gun loving freaks can reply…did this get your blood pressure up? Good…

  15. Dogula says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Apparently you were never a Boy Scout. “Be prepared” is a good motto. As long as you’re prepared, there’s no reason to be “paranoid and full of fear”.
    Project much?

  16. sunriser2 says - Posted: August 18, 2014

    Time to throw my fire extinguisher away. Never used the darn thing in fifty years.